Cross-industry commercial proposition
Juno Financial Suite helps hospitality groups, restaurant chains, cruise operators, retailers and other complex estates understand every transaction through settlement and reconciliation.
Finance teams in multi-site operations rarely lack payment data. They lack agreement between sources. Transactions sit in the PMS and POS, settlement arrives from one or more acquirers net of fees, the bank statement shows a third view, and the ERP needs a single defensible number. Reconciling those views by spreadsheet is workable at one site and unsustainable across an estate. Juno Financial Suite is the control layer that matches those sources, exposes the differences as reviewable exceptions and hands the finance system a record it can post.
The operating challenge
The blocker is structural, not clerical. Payment, settlement and banking data are produced by different parties on different timelines, in different shapes.
Acquirers batch across dates and outlets and deduct fees before payout, so a settlement line rarely maps one-to-one onto a day of trading.
Juno matches transactions to settlement records and makes the fee, timing and batching differences explicit rather than something to be reverse-engineered.
Refunds, chargebacks, partial captures and failed postings are often found during month-end rather than when they occur.
Unmatched and anomalous items are raised as exceptions with the surrounding payment context, so they can be worked during the period.
Where reconciliation happens in spreadsheets, the posting into the finance system inherits whatever assumptions were made along the way.
Reconciled output feeds ERP integration, so the posted record traces back through settlement to the originating transactions.
Primary value proposition
Start with the operating context, then move into the products, solutions and integrations that make the proposition real.
Business outcomes
See payment, settlement and reconciliation context across properties, outlets and legal entities.
Automate matching and surface only the cases that genuinely need a finance team's attention.
Move reliable payment records into the ERP and shorten the path to month-end confidence.
Deployment patterns
Transactions matched to settlement records across acquirers, with exceptions surfaced for review.
Bank statement data added to the match, closing the loop between payout and the account it landed in.
Reconciled output posted into the finance system of record through ERP integration.
Platform proof
Finance teams assess Juno on traceability: whether a posted number can be followed back through settlement to the transactions that produced it. Values below come from the canonical platform statistics registry.
Settlement from several acquiring relationships is matched into one reconciled view rather than reconciled separately by hand.
Refunds, chargebacks, partial captures and failed postings surface with payment context while they can still be worked.
Reconciled output feeds ERP integration, so the record posted to the system of record carries its own audit trail.
Relevant integrations
Knowledge
Acquirers batch transactions across dates and outlets and deduct fees before paying out, and card scheme timing differs by product and region. A settlement line therefore reflects a set of transactions and deductions rather than a trading day. Reconciliation exists to make those differences explicit and reviewable.
Related: Settlement
Anything that cannot be matched confidently — unmatched transactions, unexpected fee differences, refunds and chargebacks that fall outside the expected pattern, and postings that failed. Exceptions are raised with the surrounding payment context so they can be worked during the period rather than discovered at month-end.
Related: Reconciliation
Reconciled output feeds the finance system of record through ERP integration, so the posted record traces back through settlement to the originating transactions. The exact posting model depends on the ERP and the group's chart of accounts, and is agreed during implementation.
Related: ERP integration
Yes. Multi-acquirer estates are a common reason finance teams look at reconciliation in the first place. Settlement and reconciliation context is carried per acquirer while still rolling up to a single view for the group.
Tell us which acquirers, systems and entities are in scope. We will map what can be matched automatically and what should stay a reviewed exception.
Still researching? Visit the Learning Centre
Related on 934
A finance leader's guide to what hotels and restaurants really pay to accept card payments — interchange, scheme fees, acquiring and platform margin — and nine practical ways to reduce the total cost of payments across an international estate.
Dashboards answer what happened. Operational intelligence answers what deserves attention, and why — a practical guide to the ladder, the readiness checks and the governance boundary.
A practical framework for hotel payment SOPs — how payments should be posted, authorised, refunded, checked at night audit and reconciled to settlement, with 12 controls and a reusable template.
Fees, batching and timing across acquirers.
Deeper background on payment operations.
